Posts Tagged Access Control

HID Signo Readers Announced.

HID announced an entirely new reader line today, called Signo.  What’s immediately noticeable is they are more sleek and stylish than the iClass R or RP models, but looking further, we found that there are some distinct differences that might just make switching to this new reader platform sensible.

For starters, the keypad reader model looks more functional, and the mullion keypad reader is a definite necessity.  The keypads are capacitive  touch style which should make them more reliable in harsh environments.

Dimensions for the readers is almost identical, with the Signo readers being a little slimmer, but probably not by very much.  See Feature Comparison Matrix.

What’s missing though, like in the RP series, is a long range parking lot reader like the R90.  This is a needed technology that should be added in the future (are you listening, HID?).

The Signo series seems to lump all the reader technologies in together, making the product selection a little less confusing than previous iClass reader selections.  This is most welcomed.  Supported technologies are 125Khz proximity, iClass, SEOS, Mifare, plus mobile credentials via Bluetooth and NFC, plus Apple’s Enhanced Contactless Polling technology for apple wallet credentials.  

Other features are better support for crypto keys (no more base encryption key in the wild, for now), automatic tuning/detuning for optimized read range, and OSDP support out of the box.  Reader tamper is now a dry contact relay (THANK YOU).   But the biggest thing installers are going to enjoy is that the Signo readers support remote management.  No more configuration cards to go around to every reader just to turn of the 125Khz prox read feature set.  This should have been done LONG AGO.   Firmware updates, configuration, and reader management can be done via mobile device or over OSDP (assuming your PACS supports it).

From our take, these readers appear to have been developed largely for the Campus environment (the Apple ECP is a dead giveaway), but certainly have the feature sets that would make them desirable in the commercial, government, and industrial markets as well.  We don’t  have any evaluation copies yet, but will definitely be looking at these for new projects where they fit and offer additional security, style, and convenience.

Feature Comparison Matrix

Reader RP40 Signo 40
Dimensions 3.3″ x 4.8″ x 1.0″ 3.15″ x 4.78″ x 0.77″
Read Range (typ)

iCLASS: 2.4″

125Khz Prox: 2.8″ to 4.3″

iCLASS: 1.6″ to 4″

125Khz Prox: 2.4″ to 4″

Power 85ma @ 16VDC 75ma @ 12VDC
Comm Wiegand & (optional) OSDP  Wiegand & OSDP
Reader Tamper Open Collector Output Dry Contact Relay
Configuration Programming Cards Mobile Device or OSDP
Weatherproof If optional gasket installed Yes
Certifications UL294, EAL5+ UL294, EAL6+
Price ~$200.00 ~$200.00

 

 

Posted in: Access Control, Company News, Security Technology

Leave a Comment (0) →

Facial Recognition for Access Control?

Several years ago,  I worked on a project prototype for a major group of sea ports that had an interest to use the state’s drivers license image database for facial recognition/verification of TWIC applicants and the eventual use for identity verification for critical card access points.  The main focus of the project was to ensure that the person applying for the TWIC card was indeed who they claimed to be, and not an imposter.   Neither the CCTV system nor the card access system had the built in software to do this, much less do it together, so we had to write the interface and the software to manage it.  It worked, but not as well as we would have liked.   We used a GPL’d algorithm for the facial recognition, which while good, would have some false positives and false negatives from time to time.   Ultimately to me, it served as a proof of concept.  It did work, and could be made as a serviceable monitoring and investigation tool for security.  (Later we used that same GPL software to create a tool that would scrounge through the card access database and crop the cardholder photos to a uniform size.  THAT worked really well.)

Years later, as far as I know there is still not an off-the-shelf system that provides a true facial recognition monitoring capability for access control violations.  This seems like something very straightforward to do, and as most companies or government branches have an actively maintained photo database of their cardholder personnel, and most often have video cameras monitoring locations where access control is used.

The biggest limitation we found was the quality of the CCTV images against the badge database photos.   Both were of rather poor quality, but if we used the software as just a pre-filtering tool for security operators, the margins of error were more tolerable.  The idea was to still have a security guard doing the verification, but not for every photo, just the ones the software couldn’t handle well.

Cardholder with back to camera.

Poor camera angle doesn’t allow for good facial recognition

With Megapixel IP cameras replacing low resolution analog cameras, the probability improves of having a photo with an acceptable number of unique data points to match against an image database with a high degree of confidence.  This means more information data points to compare, and fewer false positives and negatives.   There are still other considerations such as angle of view, proper lensing, lighting, face concealment/alteration issues, and image database accuracy.  And you must have most, if not all of these considerations to have a usable image.  As shown here, even if you have good lighting and resolution, if you don’t have a good angle and lensing, you will not have a usable image for facial recognition of the cardholder.

Currently, there are about a dozen corporations world wide that offer some type of facial recognition software.   Many of their larger customers are government agencies or the financial industry.  It is used in some border crossings, passport identification, and high profile monuments.   The FBI may be the most famous consumer of this technology, but it is not used in a widespread fashion as far as I know.  Naturally, this isn’t something that is widely advertised by these agencies.

Still, as such a highly technically savvy country as the USA supposedly is, I’ve often wondered why we don’t have facial recognition with a national database at all critical locations like border crossings, airports, bus stations, train stations, embassies, and hospitals.  I realize there’s a modest invasion of privacy, and nobody likes the thought of having “big brother” monitor your whereabouts, especially putting your name to your face in a specific location and time.   It’s kind of creepy.  But the other side of the coin is that if we maintain a central photographic database of active criminals and terrorists (which we do), then having feeds from certain cameras in certain high traffic locations might allow us to not only apprehend said criminals/terrorists in a timely manner, but even allow us to gain intelligence regarding their commuting patterns, associations, and personal habits.  This is beneficial information that can reduce crime and terrorism.

Keep in mind, the government already has a very large database of photos, probably including you, even if you don’t have a mug shot in the NCIC.  Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, are all repositories available that most likely link your face with your name.   The FBI has said that by 2015, it plans to have 52 million photos in its NGI facial recognition database.   The FBI will include non-criminal information as well as criminal.  Where’d they get those?!    So, you may already be in the database, and maybe me too.  Obviously, some people will object to this idea, some even quite profusely.  But the genie is already out of the bottle.  Getting him stuffed back in is going to be difficult, if not impossible.

So the natural progression on this “big brother” concern just may be to license the database.   For a fee, allow vetted customers to have access to the database via an API to use this centralized database for government and limited private commercial purposes.  Want to know if your daughter or son is in the NGI database?  Maybe there’s a background check service company that can tell you.   But for financial institutions, or the port authority I mentioned in the beginning of this article, it would be a boon of intelligence data.   Not only would they have their own employees and contractors in their own database, they could also have access to a national database of “persons of interest” that could assist them in determining if a potential applicant is a criminal, or maybe even just a high risk.  That has the simultaneous possibility of reducing their own risks, and providing timely information to Homeland Security about a potential threats whereabouts and possible intentions.

Facial recognition of employees at work

Facial recognition in the workplace.

I think the future of this technology is already headed in this direction, and there may already be entities that are doing exactly what I’ve described, but I believe the technology will become more pervasive as some of the technological (and sociological) barriers are broken down.

Posted in: Access Control, Company News, Security Technology

Leave a Comment (0) →

PINs Matter

scramblepad

Hirsch Scramblepad

When working with a client once, they asked us to help harden their biological research labs by recommending additional security measures they could install. We did an initial and very casual walkthrough with them of the labs and how they were used. They were particularly proud of the Hirsch Scramblepads they had installed for access controlled doors. For those unfamiliar with these, they are an ingenious type of PIN pad where the numbers change each time you begin to enter your PIN sequence. This way, someone cannot peek merely at where your fingers were and assume that if you were at the bottom right of the pad, it was a 9. Anyway, they were (and still are in some circles) the Cadillac of PIN pads for access control.

As we began interviewing some of the lab staff, we asked how well they liked the keypads and how they were used. Most responded that they felt the keypads worked very well and were kind of “Star Wars” like because of their technology. We soon learned however, that the PINs used were 4 digit pins, and that there were a couple of hundred people who had access to these labs. To make it worse, departmental policy was that the individual was allowed to select their own PIN.  Yikes.

So, I promptly walked up to a PIN pad, and entered “1234”.

“Click”.  The door opened.

Okay, “1379”.  “Click”.

Yep.  Hmmm, one more, “2468”.  “Click”.   Okay, I see the biggest problem…

The good news, is it was a cheap fix.  That doesn’t mean easy, it was just cheap.  The long term fix was to add card access with CARD+PIN readers to enhance security; but in the mean time, we just increased the number of digits in the PIN, and assigned the PINs to the staff instead of letting them pick their own.  That’s why it wasn’t easy.  Some of the staff complained because now they had to learn a new PIN, and sometimes they forgot it, locking themselves out of the lab until they could remember it or get it reset.   Memorizing a new number (don’t we have enough numbers, passwords, etc. to learn already?!) is not fun and shouldn’t be necessary just to get into work.

Reading this now, this all probably seems like common sense to you, and it is.  It’s just that sometimes common sense isn’t used in practical applications the way we would always expect.  Security is a hassle, an inconvenience.  So, someone decided to make it easier on people and let them pick their own PIN.   This is were Security Policy and Procedures come into play.  They should be developed, implemented, maintained, and tested.  Had a proper policy been conceived and applied to the issuance of access control PINs, our job wouldn’t have been so easy.

PINs Matter

Just like passwords, a weak PIN is worse than NO PIN at all, because it gives you a false sense of security when there really is none.  If you still use only PINs, pick unique PIN of at least 8 digits, and ensure that they are unique for each user.  But better still, couple a PIN with an additional level of access control such as card access or biometrics.  After all, two levels of security are always better than one.

 

 

Posted in: Access Control, Security Technology

Leave a Comment (0) →